By Joy Scott, Am Haskalah Congregant The translation of this week’s Torah Parsha (CHAYEI SARAH) is ‘The Life of Sarah’. Ironically, only the first two lines of the Parsha pertain...
by Joy Scott, Am Haskalah Congregant
For the last two weeks of Shabbat, we interrupted our Torah reading of LEVITICUS, first to repeat specific chapters of EXODUS, for the first two days of Passover; and, subsequently to read several portions of DEUTERONOMY for the eighth and final day of Passover.
This week, we return to the book of LEVITICUS with the reading of Parsha: ACHAREI MOT. The primary focus of ACHAREI MOT pertains to the ancient rituals of Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement. During the period of MISHNAH (i.e. first major redaction of the oral Torah) in the second century, the Jewish calendar was altered, so that the beginning of the New Year (Rosh Hashanah) followed by Yom Kippur would begin in the fall. The logic for this calendar shift was for each New Year to coincide with the beginning of the cultivation of the agrarian land, which was home to the Israelites (1).
Nevertheless, after the abominable incident of the ‘Golden Calf’; the sins and consequential death of Aaron’s two eldest sons; and the widespread anarchy of the Israelites, our Lord deemed it appropriate for the people to repent for their transgressions. ACHAREI MOT begins with the words: “And the Lord said to Moses, speak to your brother Aaron, who will be bringing ‘sin’ sacrifices from the Israelites, that he should not come into the Holy within the dividing curtain, or he will surely die like his sons, for I appear over the Ark cover in a dark cloud” (2).
Aaron, acting in his role as High Priest brought sacrificial animals to make atonement, first for his own sins; then for the sins of his ‘house’; and, finally for the sins of all Israelites. The most peculiar element of this Yom Kippur service was the ritual of the two virtually identical goats – – one offered as sacrifice to God, the other sent away to ‘AZAI’ to die in the wilderness (3). Debates about the significance of the different destinies of the two goats have been ongoing for thousands of years.
Maimonides offers the most compelling explanation, that the ritual was intended as a symbolic drama:
“There is no doubt that sins cannot be carried like a burden, and taken off the shoulder of one being, to be laid on that of another being. These ceremonies are of a symbolic character, to induce people to repent; as if to say, we have freed ourselves of our previous deeds; have cast them behind our backs; and, removed them from us as far as possible” (4).
On Yom Kippur, we repent in a ‘communal’ sense of a litany of wrongs, enumerated in two alphabetical lists, one beginning ‘ASHAMNU BAGADNU’, the other starting with ‘AL CHEIT SHECHATANU’. In reading these lists of transgressions, there are two very notable characteristics: First, most of the sins we confess relate to our interactions with other people. Second, the individual Jew takes responsibility for the sins of the ‘collective’ society, regardless of whether he or she is guilty of the malfeasance.
“From a theological perspective, the entire community will rise or fall together, held accountable for the actions of its constituent members” (5).
In the core of every branch of Judaism is the fact that the fate of the individual is inextricably tied to the fate of the collective, of which he or she is a part.
(2) Leviticus (16:1-2)
(3) Leviticus (16:7-22)
(4) Maimonides, “Guide for the Perplexed” (3:46)
(5) UJA Federation of New York